STJ911 Scientist to Sue BBC for Public Deception

[hgmaster]

A British scientist and member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice , John A. Blacker MSc IMI (Physical Systems), is planning to sue the BBC for mass public deception via their “9/11: The Conspiracy Files” programme, RINF Alternative News (http://www.rinf.com/) can reveal.
The programme which aired on 18 February, 2007, promised to offer a thorough examination of the events of 9/11 and answer many of the questions posed by the 9/11 Truth Movement.


Full Story can be found here
http://rinf.com/alt-news/911-truth/st911-scientist-to-sue-bbc-for-public-deception/776/

[One-Shot]

Full Story can be found here
http://rinf.com/alt-news/911-truth/st911-scientist-to-sue-bbc-for-public-deception/776/
Why did you make another topic on 9/11? You already got owned in the first one.

[hgmaster]

Why did you make another topic on 9/11? You already got owned in the first one.


The idea is for you to comment on the article not me. If you cant direct your attention to that, then I suggest you just not post anything at all.

[One-Shot]

Fine, the person will lose the lawsuit simple as that. I hope he found a attorney as crazy as him to do a pro bono thing because he is just throwing money away then.

[hgmaster]

Fine, the person will lose the lawsuit simple as that. I hope he found a attorney as crazy as him to do a pro bono thing because he is just throwing money away then.


Your possibly correct, I cant really comment on how the courts are in the UK, but he does make some real strong points, and he is using math and physics to prove his point.

[One-Shot]

Your possibly correct, I cant really comment on how the courts are in the UK, but he does make some real strong points, and he is using math and physics to prove his point.
lol oh math and physics, well then he must be smart.

[Vulgotha]

Another day, another crackpot theorist.


Seriously, your beating a dead cow and only making yourself look like a fool.


Only people who believe this are:

1. Die hard liberals

2.people who flat out hate Bush\America (which typically fall under #1) are even beginning to state this is a possibility.

3.Charlie Sheen (both 1 and 2 lol).

[JordanL]

Full Story can be found here
http://rinf.com/alt-news/911-truth/st911-scientist-to-sue-bbc-for-public-deception/776/

???

This is one of the most confusing things I've ever seen. No real sane person would ever shoot their career to hell like this guy is. He's lost all credibility in a very public way by doing this.

[Hexadecimal]

This guy makes perfectly valid points, especially with the physics. I'd like to see someone argue against his first point.

[JordanL]

Hex: http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/cmh/simulation/

:)

[lordmadjack]

Seems fairly well argued to me, + rep JL :D

[hgmaster]

Hex: http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/cmh/simulation/

:)


Yeah, I have seen this site a long time ago. It doesn't hold much water when you go back and watch tapes of the towers getting hit by the planes and falling. The two planes hit it completely different spots. One hits just the corner of the building. What happens when you take a leg off a table? How about we cut just one leg half way through and then sit on the table. The table collapses straight down? The biggest debunking aspect of that site is the fact that it has been proved that after the planes hit the buildings, the buildings were structural sound. Its obvious people haven't researched this issue a lot, but I am real glad to see that after 6 years some of you are:DD Keep up the good work.

[Hexadecimal]

Hex: http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/cmh/simulation/

:)

Where does it say anything about the towers falling? That study is only about the impact of the planes.