Another 9/11 Conspiracy

[coolguy]

Here is another 9/11 conspiracy its a moive called lose change.
the govermnet and bin ladden was in it together.
and they had bombs planted in the WTC..
SO WATCH THIS MOIVE

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7218920724339766288&q=loose+change&hl=en

[momomike3]

That has been out a very long time. It was completely debunked by another video, and popular mechanics.

[netbevit]

Seriously, welcome to 3 years ago. That movie is fictional.

[USAF]

Its hard to believe theres idiots out there that believe this

[Fekz]

That has been out a very long time. It was completely debunked by another video, and popular mechanics.

Popular Mechanics was virtually debunked. You'd better check your sources.

[Zetsumei]

Dude that is so old that they are working on their 3rd one now... lol.
Anyways if you haven't seen it. You should def. take a look at it!

[momomike3]

What about the other video hotshot? You havin' lunch with Rosie too much?

[netbevit]

Dude that is so old that they are working on their 3rd one now... lol.
Anyways if you haven't seen it. You should def. take a look at it!


Why should people watch a video made by a kid who stated that the original Loose Change was based on FICTIONAL information and that he only turned it into a "real video" after it picked up hype... Rofl.

This video has been debunked by many sites, people, magazines, radio stations, etc...

It's stupidity at its finest.

Here is a full 6 Article rip-up of Loose Change's BULL****.

http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html

[Mikleran]

http://www.lolloosechange.co.nr/

One of the best ripping-aparts of a story I've ever seen. :lol:

[hoverbike]

What about the other video hotshot? You havin' lunch with Rosie too much?

I dislike Rosie O'Donnell A LOT but at least she has the guts to risk her career (:lol:) for asking questions and exercising her first amendment. People right and left are now calling for her to be fired by ABC. I don't see what's wrong with asking questions of the government and demanding the truth about what really happened on 9/11.

There is a website for petitions: www.defendrosie.com

[Vulgotha]

What really happened was a bunch of radicial islamists attempted to destroy the world trade center for the second time, and succeeded. thusly killing hundreds upon hundreds of people.

To completely turn that terrible and tragic loss, that horrendous crime, as political ammunition to shoot at the government (and its immediate president) borders on treason in my opinion.

[momomike3]

Rosie should be fired. Her audience is made up of not very smart housewives who hear this crap and believe it as fact. She claimed the Brits went into Iranian waters to start a war. She even compared the situation to the Gulf of Tonkin. I wonder if she even knows where that is... because most likely one of her ultra-liberal lesbian friends came up with it and she simply regurgitated it to sound sophisticated.

[Pr0LiFiX]

I am sick of the people who think that 9/11 is a conspiracy.

That's some disrespect you're showing to the people who died that day.

[hoverbike]

I am sick of the people who think that 9/11 is a conspiracy.

That's some disrespect you're showing to the people who died that day.

This is true disrespect for 9/11 victims...using their remains to fill potholes and pave roads:

Links here (http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/victims_remains_used_to_fill_potholes.htm) and here (http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070323/ts_nm/sept11_remains_dc).

[mikewill57]

^Wow!!! I don't think it's any disrespect to make films or discuss conspiracy theories. I mean, was it disrespectful for Oliver Stone to make JFK? No. These theories exist. Even if they are wrong they do good. They make us remember and question what really happened. For one, I refuse to believe that what we were told by the administration is what happened. They have no reason to tell the people the truth, why start on Sept. 11?

[MikeAaronB]

This is true disrespect for 9/11 victims...using their remains to fill potholes and pave roads:

Links here (http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/victims_remains_used_to_fill_potholes.htm) and here (http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070323/ts_nm/sept11_remains_dc).

Oh my God. That's sick. :shock:

[Sventax]

they got 4 chances to kill Osama (clear shots to the head) but they never killed them( orders from the US top military)
2 times head shot by the brits and pulling th e trigger was denied.

[Vulgotha]

they got 4 chances to kill Osama (clear shots to the head) but they never killed them( orders from the US top military)
2 times head shot by the brits and pulling th e trigger was denied.


I'm disinclined to take what you say at face value.

Irregardless, most people would rather have Bin Laden alive. Terrorist Cells like Al Quida cannot simply be slain by cutting the "Head" (Bin Laden) off the snake. We need him alive, obtain information out of him (by almost any means necessary) and then, we cap him in the skull, I'd do it myself if offered.


^ I'll believe what you say if you can cite accurate, and non biased (or as non biased as you can get nowadays) sources and facts. But either way, even if what you say is true, it means nothing. In the infamous words of the Fettman: "He's worth more to me alive".

[Kougaiji]

So 3 years ago, how about you check out the Titanic conspiracy?

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=af07

[c.a.p]

So 3 years ago, how about you check out the Titanic conspiracy?

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=af07

Oh god, thank you for posting this, I forgot about it! :lol: The lengths some people go to gain attention, and this parodies it perfectly. :lol:

[Lethal]

That has been out a very long time. It was completely debunked by another video, and popular mechanics.

The "debunks" rely purely on speculation and blatent lies, there probably is a way to scientificly debunk LC but popular mechanics failed miserably.

LC does make some good arguments, though.

And as for Lolloosechange...that's even more pathetic that PM.

[c.a.p]

The "debunks" rely purely on speculation and blatent lies, there probably is a way to scientificly debunk LC but popular mechanics failed miserably.

LC does make some good arguments, though.

And as for Lolloosechange...that's even more pathetic that PM.

You must admit though that some of the so called "points" made in Loose Change are simply ridiculous. For example, although steel does not melt at the temperature at which jet fuel burns, it does lose a considerable amount of strength, enough to weaken the towers to the point that they can no longer hold the weight of the floors above the impact zone. The impact of the planes and the subsequent explosions didn't help either.

[momomike3]

Have you seen the debate on Democracy Now? PM DESTROYED the loose change guys. All they were able to say was "think long and hard about what your government could be doing..." yadda yadda yadda.

[AntoD]

you know what? i was thinking about Bush playing Halo 2 on Xbox Live, and i figured that 1.he can really only play w/ his cabinet members 2.if he used the headseat, it would be on a secure line (most likely a fiber-optic wire) 3. he'd get his butt whipped

[DINAMO788]

koug thats hilarious...the letter rearranging and it was the jews lol...priceless

[pendinginsanity]

Teh ILLUMINADOS! TEH COUNCIL!!! DOOM I SAY DOOMSDAY!!!

[Axe&Hammer]

I am sick of the people who think that 9/11 is a conspiracy.

That's some disrespect you're showing to the people who died that day.

How so? presenting a different opinion doesn't change what happened.

I am not convinced that a 757 hit the Pentagon,or that the hijackers would have used that low of an angle of attack or that attack axis. Also other more juicy targets were not hit,despite being of higher value to us,like the Statue of Liberty or the White House.

[Eraser.]

they got 4 chances to kill Osama (clear shots to the head) but they never killed them( orders from the US top military)
2 times head shot by the brits and pulling th e trigger was denied.

Source please.

I think you are mistaken. Usually in these cases something that is fact is taken and construed to put the argument in the conspiracy theorists favor. Bill Clinton had maybe 2 oportunities to kill Osama (yes, he was a target before 9/11 as well), but Clinton didnt. Why? Because it is illegal. Geneva conventions forbid assassinations.

I highly doubt anyone has ever had a clear shot of the head. What, was he on a cigarette break, and his friends dont want him to smoke up the cave? Osama changes his location spontaneously, sometimes with only 2 hours notice to everyone else. Even if we did no where he was, he would be gone before "top military command" (how conveniently vague) even heard wind of it.


On the topic of loose change, its the funniest movie I have ever seen. I thought it was a joke until someone told me people actually believe it.