View Full Version : Official SuperBowl Thread (Rigged or Not)
NoUseMercenary
February 6th, 2006, 08:15 AM
After watching the SuperBowl I would have to say the Refs were definitly paid off. - Last years Superbowl with Seattle and Pittsburg
Anyways, the thread is re-opened to discuss this years upcoming Superbowl Colts vs. the Saints.
Have at em
40s
February 6th, 2006, 02:06 PM
This is BS, if the Sea Hawks wanted to challenge the ruling on the field they should have threw their little red flag more than 0 times.
Go watch the Steelers Colts game and tell me it didn't have just as many close calls. Don't be a sore loser, the Sea Hawks will go down as the team with the *****yest fans. Every Sea Hawk fan (except the actual team) has done nothing but ***** and moan since then end of the game.
Face it, it was destiny. It was the 36th day of the year, we were in Detroit, and the stadium was packed with Steelers fans.
It's not like your team was brow beating anyone, you weren't a better team, you were on the same level at best. We had a tougher road to the superbowl. Not only was our division way harder than yours, we had to overcome three straight road games, one of which was in the dreaded Mile High Stadium. So stop *****ing
Perfect Sin
February 6th, 2006, 08:26 PM
The only thing that really mattered was the Rothlesbuger TD. That was so close...too close to be called a TD. I mean after reply after reply he must have gotten in by a Milimeter.
Any other time than the 2 minute warning, that call would have reviewed and probably tunred over. That took people 30 minutes to an hour to make up their minds.
But whatever, that superbowl was mad boring.
StrikeMaster Ice
February 6th, 2006, 09:14 PM
I agree, it was boring.
Lp Chris XII
February 6th, 2006, 09:27 PM
It wasn't just that call, there were many calls that I felt were far too biased. I'm glad that Pittsburgh won since I'm a Steelers fan, but some of the calls on the Seahawks were just too ridiculous if you ask me. They were calling holding on the Seahawks almost every other play, and if there was any actual holding then it was usually very far from the play and irrelevant. Then the "blocking below the waist" call on Hasselbeck, which was also very odd. The Rothlesberger touchdown, and Jackson's push-off call which took back a TD from Seattle, these were all very close calls that could've gone either way, but ended up as calls on Seattle every time.
Pink
February 6th, 2006, 10:03 PM
Ben was in, no question at all, and Jackson clearly pushed off on the TD... How was it rigged again?
DDT
February 6th, 2006, 10:16 PM
Talk about being a bad loser.
NoUseMercenary
February 6th, 2006, 10:58 PM
I posted a full 700 word thing about all the bad calls adn the calls that were not called. You guys can say whatever you want but that game had the most unquestionable and unreasonable play calling I have ever seen in sports. If you can say the Pitts. clearly out played Seattle in terms of the game itself.... How can you sleep at night.
Pink
February 6th, 2006, 11:06 PM
I posted a full 700 word thing about all the bad calls adn the calls that were not called. You guys can say whatever you want but that game had the most unquestionable and unreasonable play calling I have ever seen in sports. If you can say the Pitts. clearly out played Seattle in terms of the game itself.... How can you sleep at night.
Sigh... no offense, but i hate when don't have a clue what they are talking about and then try to argue the other way...
BOTH major plays were called right in the end which is what should have happened. Face it, Seattle crapped the bed and they only have themselves to blame.
ozone
February 6th, 2006, 11:17 PM
Roethilsberger did not make that TD and Jackson merely shook himself loose of any hold he had on him and the TD was legit.
/discussion.
findaway
February 7th, 2006, 12:34 AM
Rigged? absolutely not.. a few very arguable decisions? no doubt. Some key points for Pittsburgh during the game were legit, so were the TD's, even the QB's one since it was such a hard call i felt it could have gone either way and after all, i believe they would have needed a pretty clear evidence to be able to take it back, which was just not possible to have.
This goes aside from me liking the Steelers better also. I also think it wasn't Hasselbeck's finest game, they had good chances to make things even, or to their favor slightly at some point.
King.Kong
February 7th, 2006, 01:22 AM
Well I don't really like football but I watched it for the halftime and the commercials! Plus, there wasn't really anything else on television anyway.
surtur
February 7th, 2006, 01:29 AM
i dont know if it was rigged but the reffs were alittle biased i feel some of the calls were close but could have went either way but i wasnt cheering for either team and it was a slow game for the most part i want my day back lol.
theman19
February 7th, 2006, 01:50 AM
dont even get me started. i made a post before to blow some steam. and lets just say i ofically hate the steelers and eveyone in pitsburgh right now. i hate it when reviews say that seahawjs didnt take advantage in firt half on that pass for a TD. WE DID but THEY CALLED A FREAKING PASS INTERFERENCE. o well i think it was rigged by the NFL because steelers are better for marketing. i mean lets face it i love the seahawks but there just no business.
DINAMO788
February 7th, 2006, 02:09 AM
i've got too much to post on the account of the hawks but it was totally unfair.
i dont think it was rigged but maybe the 90% steeler fans affected the refs....or maybe they're just asses
hoverbike
February 7th, 2006, 02:36 AM
Plus, there wasn't really anything else on television anyway.
There was lots of great things on TV during the Superbowl like many movies, On Spike they had rare shows, and had tons of Family Guy and Simpsons. That what was on Cable.
pacman326
February 7th, 2006, 02:38 AM
I still can't believe I sat through the whole thing, it was terrible. :evil:
DeputyDon
February 7th, 2006, 02:40 AM
This is BS, if the Sea Hawks wanted to challenge the ruling on the field they should have threw their little red flag more than 0 times.
Go watch the Steelers Colts game and tell me it didn't have just as many close calls. Don't be a sore loser, the Sea Hawks will go down as the team with the *****yest fans. Every Sea Hawk fan (except the actual team) has done nothing but ***** and moan since then end of the game.
Face it, it was destiny. It was the 36th day of the year, we were in Detroit, and the stadium was packed with Steelers fans.
It's not like your team was brow beating anyone, you weren't a better team, you were on the same level at best. We had a tougher road to the superbowl. Not only was our division way harder than yours, we had to overcome three straight road games, one of which was in the dreaded Mile High Stadium. So stop *****ing
I'm a Steelers fan, but I thought the refs were paid off. If you really care at all.
Lefein
February 7th, 2006, 03:58 AM
Absurd. The SeaHawks were defeated by poor coaching decisions during crunch time. There was no score in the first half that couldn't have been answered if there was better play calling in the last minute. In all honesty, it was the Hawks' game but they dropped the ball figuratively and literally.
I'm tired of hearing belly-aching about big games. We are in the age of the replay, so it's all on the coaches to do their job now. An errant call or two has always been in the game yet now, more than ever, there is accountability for it.
DeputyDon
February 7th, 2006, 04:10 AM
Absurd. The SeaHawks were defeated by poor coaching decisions during crunch time. There was no score in the first half that couldn't have been answered if there was better play calling in the last minute. In all honesty, it was the Hawks' game but they dropped the ball figuratively and literally.
I'm tired of hearing belly-aching about big games. We are in the age of the replay, so it's all on the coaches to do their job now. An errant call or two has always been in the game yet now, more than ever, there is accountability for it.
Wow your getting pretty angry over, a football game. Whether it was poor coaching or not, the Seahawks' got some penaltys for no reason, this is coming from a Steelers fan....
40s
February 7th, 2006, 05:23 AM
You're the most lukewarm Steeler's fan I've ever seen Don. You think the reffs were paid, what are you some kind of idiot?
There is a guy that worked at NASA who thinks the moon landing was faked: what does his opinion mean to most people? Jack ****. "Duhhhhh But he worked at NASA," he's still an idiot, saying he's a part of the group that conducted the moon landing doesn't absolve him from being a bat **** crazy S.O.B. now does it?
NoUseMercenary
February 8th, 2006, 01:14 AM
wow...you know if you are going to vent you might want to edit some of your words..... There is no reason to get mad here. I was just wondering people's opinions on the game.....there is no reason to bash others because of what the believe in.
Crazy Phat
February 8th, 2006, 01:19 AM
I like both teams. Though I belive that call was quiet suspicious
NoUseMercenary
February 8th, 2006, 01:25 AM
I think that there was so much money in Las Vegas and the mafia on the Steelers winning, that the game was fixed. Not to mention that there was pressure behind giving the Steelers the win so they could have their 5 rings and to give Jerome Bettis a good finish.
Also, as you saw, there was about 90% Steelers Fans at the Superbowl. When a SuperBowl is set up the tickets are divided equaly amongst the teams to ensure that there is a equal amount of fans for both sides.....well that sure didn't happen at this years SuperBowl...lol..........
The calls that were made helped in the Steelers to win. there is no way around it. One of the calls gave the Steelers a TD, another took one away from the Seahawks. There is 14 points right there. Then, all the penelty calls against Seattle when there was nothing to call them on. The call where the offensive lineman held the Pitts. linebacker should have been offset because he was offsides. 3 plays in a row the Steelers were offsides blitzing from that one side and it wasn't called once. Then the penalty on Matt Hasselback for blocking under the knees, when in fact he was tackling the guy who intrecpted the ball.....its like WTF.........those refs had to be paid off.
Also did you notice how the refs took a while to throw the penalty flags but when they called Matt's run and fall where the ball poped out...they spent no time deciding that it was questionable...thecalled it a fumble without disregard.....I mean.. If the ground causes the fumble then he is down. so it shouldn't have mattered anyway. I saw that right off the bat from the replay.
Also....a conspiracy. The Head Ref....this was his first SuperBowl ever....hmmm
Also....when your team has poor and unfair calls throughout the game its a big demoralizer and that could ahve been the key factor to the Seahawks losing.
40s
February 8th, 2006, 01:35 AM
There were bad calls, there were wrong call, but there were no suspicious calls whatsoever.
soldier one
February 8th, 2006, 03:05 AM
all i have to say is the steelers would have still won if it wasnt. :D
but yes something was up with the refs they either are not meant to be refs or yes it was rigged, i dont think a super bowl should be like that its just wrong. even espn shows like sportscenter said the refs sucked, not in that words, but appropiate for television. but whats done is done.
NoUseMercenary
February 8th, 2006, 03:07 AM
I know...I just wanted to see what others felt on the subject.
DeputyDon
February 8th, 2006, 03:21 AM
You're the most lukewarm Steeler's fan I've ever seen Don. You think the reffs were paid, what are you some kind of idiot?
There is a guy that worked at NASA who thinks the moon landing was faked: what does his opinion mean to most people? Jack ****. "Duhhhhh But he worked at NASA," he's still an idiot, saying he's a part of the group that conducted the moon landing doesn't absolve him from being a bat **** crazy S.O.B. now does it?
I guess I am an idiot, but whether i'm "a Lukewarm Steelers' fan or not, I still believe some plays were wrongly called. On the front page of the news paper I read it showed a time with steelers got a touchdown and it was obviously not over the line, but they still called it as a touchdown. If the seahawks would have challenged the play i'm sure it would they play would not have stood.
I'll admit, I'm not the biggest football fan in the world, not even close. But I think thats better than being a fanboy of one team and not opening my mind to realize that possibly, just possibly the refs were paid off, especially with that many wrong calls.
WhatRuOn
February 8th, 2006, 03:24 AM
Huh? ( I need five words)
NoUseMercenary
February 8th, 2006, 03:26 AM
If the seahawks would have challenged the play i'm sure it would they play would not have stood.
For one, it was within the two minuet warning and the SeaHawks couldn't have challegened it. Two it was challegened by the both and reviewed by the "paid off" refs who still decided it was a TD.....
soldier one
February 8th, 2006, 03:40 AM
For one, it was within the two minuet warning and the SeaHawks couldn't have challegened it. Two it was challegened by the both and reviewed by the "paid off" refs who still decided it was a TD.....
the TD i completely agree with sea fans even though i wasnt rooting for them, he was clearly not in and crawled in after. that was a horrible call, i just wanted to see a fair game.
40s
February 8th, 2006, 04:51 AM
You're the most lukewarm Steeler's fan I've ever seen Don. You think the reffs were paid, what are you some kind of idiot?
There is a guy that worked at NASA who thinks the moon landing was faked: what does his opinion mean to most people? Jack ****. "Duhhhhh But he worked at NASA," he's still an idiot, saying he's a part of the group that conducted the moon landing doesn't absolve him from being a bat **** crazy S.O.B. now does it?
I guess I am an idiot, but whether i'm "a Lukewarm Steelers' fan or not, I still believe some plays were wrongly called. On the front page of the news paper I read it showed a time with steelers got a touchdown and it was obviously not over the line, but they still called it as a touchdown. If the seahawks would have challenged the play i'm sure it would they play would not have stood.
I'll admit, I'm not the biggest football fan in the world, not even close. But I think thats better than being a fanboy of one team and not opening my mind to realize that possibly, just possibly the refs were paid off, especially with that many wrong calls.
Ok you're not an idiot, sorry for that, but why can't the reffs have made bad calls without it being a conspiracy? That's what I don't understand.
The touchdown call went along the guide lines of that there needs to be undeniable evidence supporting a over ruling, and there was not, it was close, but not enough to overturn.
and other bad call was obviously the case of the reff not seeing it right, something that happens a lot in sports. WHY DOES IT HAVE TO BE A CONSPIRACY!
NoUseMercenary
February 8th, 2006, 05:01 AM
Did any of you watch Letterman last night? I think it was Letterman....it was one of the late nite shows....but anyway. Ben, the QB for the Steelers admittedt hat he didn't make it over the TD line.....He said he was actually surprized the refs called it a TD instead of calling it no good and then reviewsing it.....hmmm
40s
February 8th, 2006, 05:09 AM
Did any of you watch Letterman last night? I think it was Letterman....it was one of the late nite shows....but anyway. Ben, the QB for the Steelers admittedt hat he didn't make it over the TD line.....He said he was actually surprized the refs called it a TD instead of calling it no good and then reviewsing it.....hmmm
Hmmm is right, why would he admit it if it was some huge conspiracy to doop the public? The players know that bad calls are unfortunately and fortunately part of the game, and it's no big deal because there is nothing you can do about it.
I'm glad you've finally come to your senses.
NoUseMercenary
February 8th, 2006, 05:16 AM
The players know that bad calls are unfortunately and fortunately part of the game, and it's no big deal because there is nothing you can do about it
Not like the ones we saw in the Superbowl......you should never have close calls like that in a Superbowl....
anyway...here is a link to a funny song about the SuperBowl refs
www.jaykevin.com
click on the superbowl song
40s
February 8th, 2006, 06:00 AM
I agree with you 100% man, but it's not a conspiracy and no one was paid off.
:lol: That song was prety well done. I didn't see any Sea Hawks playing like a better team, but still well done.
branden1979
January 29th, 2007, 07:45 PM
The Steelers I always thought was a garbage team. And in the Superbowl they defintely got assistance from the Refs. Basically the NFL wanted the Steelers to win so they can give appreciation to Jerome Bettis. I'm not a seahawk fan at all. But they got robbed with a flurry of bad calls against them.
AndyD
January 29th, 2007, 08:14 PM
This thread is from a year ago. I was reading it and thinking, did I miss the Superbowl, so I checked the TV schedule and saw its just coming up...then I checked the date on this thread and realized... LOL
soldier one
January 29th, 2007, 10:55 PM
I think any major sport is rigged to a extent, especially a sport like football where its almost a major holiday when the superbowl comes around. Its almost like the college football where the teams with the higher tv ratings get in the "good" games and the ones that are just as good if not better dont get in because of tv ratings.
Another thing to look at is how hard is it to not have a favorite team? Refs have to in some way.
Behemoko
January 29th, 2007, 11:04 PM
The superbowl already took place..? I cant imagine something that big going on without SOMEBODY noticing, they couldn't have payed off EVERYBODY, lol. :-)
Tribunal
January 29th, 2007, 11:09 PM
I love these old threads because I can reminisce about the old friends that have come and gone.
Dillinger-63
January 30th, 2007, 12:42 AM
Yeah, let's keep this one going for the Bears/Colts game so people can complain.
bnolan56
January 30th, 2007, 01:16 AM
Whoa for a second I thought the superbowl happened, b/c I was going to say..Its not till Feb 4th
Cyrann
January 30th, 2007, 05:56 PM
The SuperBowl would be rigged if the Saints made it and won, but since they didn't I don't think so...
Goodfella
January 30th, 2007, 05:59 PM
The SuperBowl would be rigged if the Saints made it and won, but since they didn't I don't think so...I thought the exact same thing, because that would make an amzing story for the media outlets.
Theft
January 30th, 2007, 11:14 PM
This has got to be the most idiotic post in the general forums. I am so tired of people saying that the SB is setup. My favorite is after 9/11 and it was the unstoppable St. Louis Rams vs. the no chance New England Patriots. And people said the only reason why the Patriots won was because it was to be patriotic or some crap because of the terrorist attacks. That is just plain ridiculous.
DayWalker
January 30th, 2007, 11:34 PM
yeah this thread is weak sauce.
Seattle blew the SB last year. Case closed.
Why wasn't this locked back in March 2006?
Theft
January 31st, 2007, 12:32 AM
yeah this thread is weak sauce.
Seattle blew the SB last year. Case closed.
Why wasn't this locked back in March 2006?
Good call, didn't even see that it was that old. lol
DINAMO788
January 31st, 2007, 01:24 AM
the first seattle TD counted the flag was complete BS
i dont even know how newbies find these threads......kinda funny
jfiman14
January 31st, 2007, 01:55 AM
I was thinking, oh man, I missed the super bowl, NOOOOOO! Then I saw Seahawks...ever do that to me again and you will pay :pissed:
Appolyons
January 31st, 2007, 01:57 AM
The 49ers should have been in it. They sucked the whole year but still...they should just be in it.
NoUseMercenary
January 31st, 2007, 04:56 AM
Yeah...lets keep the thread open for more talk about the upcoming Superbowl. I will change the first post so it fits
jfiman14
January 31st, 2007, 04:58 AM
The 49ers should have been in it. They sucked the whole year but still...they should just be in it.
Couldn't have said it better myself, go Niners!
DayWalker
January 31st, 2007, 05:05 AM
The 49ers should have been in it. They sucked the whole year but still...they should just be in it.
Couldn't have said it better myself, go Niners!
the 49ers suck.
And yes, I am aware of your obvious retort. ;)
jfiman14
January 31st, 2007, 05:11 AM
That they don't suck? If that's what you though we are going to say, no. They do suck, but I like them. If you thought we would agree with you, then yes.
DayWalker
January 31st, 2007, 05:12 AM
That they don't suck? If that's what you though we are going to say, no. They do suck, but I like them. If you thought we would agree with you, then yes.
oh...
actually I was expecting something like "look who knocked you out of the playoffs" or
"remember SB 24?"
:lol:
but hey we can agree. didn't see that coming...
LaOMaN
January 31st, 2007, 05:17 AM
las vegas calls all the shots. say $200,000,000 all bets on indy and $300,000,000 on chicago. then las vegas call and say indy wins and covers. its like that
las vegas makes $100,000,000 profit more then that tho because of 10% . so vegas splits 50% with nfl. both make profit. thats how i see it. dont you guys think its wierd how quarterbacks always talking on that phone. its talking to the owners. telling them to win the game or lose it
DayWalker
January 31st, 2007, 05:25 AM
las vegas calls all the shots. say $200,000,000 all bets on indy and $300,000,000 on chicago. then las vegas call and say indy wins and covers. its like that
las vegas makes $100,000,000 profit more then that tho because of 10% . so vegas splits 50% with nfl. both make profit. thats how i see it. dont you guys think its wierd how quarterbacks always talking on that phone. its talking to the owners. telling them to win the game or lose it
:lol:
good one!!!!
I always new there wasn't that much to talk about in the middle of the game.
LaOMaN
January 31st, 2007, 05:35 AM
:lol:
good one!!!!
I always new there wasn't that much to talk about in the middle of the game.
if i was owner i wouldnt want to call player while there in the middle of the game. that would mess up there grove.
if you watch some of the games. the team winning by 14 points, qb gets a call from owner then he looks sad. then next thing you know other team makes come back or covers the spreed
DayWalker
January 31st, 2007, 05:52 AM
if i was owner i wouldnt want to call player while there in the middle of the game. that would mess up there grove.
if you watch some of the games. the team winning by 14 points, qb gets a call from owner then he looks sad. then next thing you know other team makes come back or covers the spreed
ok... no.
The owners don't call the players, the coaches do.
DOMAINofPAIN
January 31st, 2007, 06:08 AM
I dont think that the superbowl is rigged
unless indy wins
GO BEARS!!!!
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.